[vc_empty_space][vc_empty_space]
Analysis and benchmarking performance of Real Time Patch Linux and Xenomai in serving a real time application
Diana Marieska M.a, Kistijantoro A.I.a, Subair M.b
a School of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia
b Indonesian Linux User Group, Indonesia
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624529070653{padding-top: 30px !important;padding-bottom: 30px !important;}”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner layout=”boxed”][vc_column_inner width=”3/4″ css=”.vc_custom_1624695412187{border-right-width: 1px !important;border-right-color: #dddddd !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-radius: 1px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Abstract” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]Every Real Time Operating System (RTOS) has different characteristics. Testing is needed to determine which criteria of real time application is suitable to be implemented using an RTOS. In this research, benchmarking is performed on two Linux based RTOS; Real Time Patch Linux and Xenomai. Benchmarking is done by running encryption application on each RTOS. RTOS performance assessed through encryption application performance. We use three performance metrics; processing time, jitter, and throughput. Tests are conducted at low load and overload conditions. Test results shows that the RT Patch Linux is able to produce higher throughput compared to Xenomai, but processing time in Xenomai is more predictive than processing time in RT Patch Linux. In overload conditions, Xenomai is able to provide more stable performance than RT Patch Linux. © 2011 IEEE.[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Author keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]Application performance,Low load,Overload condition,Performance metrices,Performance metrics,Processing Time,Real time,Real time operating system,Real-time application,Test results,Xenomai[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Indexed keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]benchmarking,performance metric,Real Time Patch Linux,Xenomai[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Funding details” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”DOI” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEI.2011.6021563[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]Widget Plumx[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][/vc_column][/vc_row]