[vc_empty_space][vc_empty_space]
Preferred growth orientation of cementite carbide by phase-field simulation
a Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624529070653{padding-top: 30px !important;padding-bottom: 30px !important;}”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner layout=”boxed”][vc_column_inner width=”3/4″ css=”.vc_custom_1624695412187{border-right-width: 1px !important;border-right-color: #dddddd !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-radius: 1px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Abstract” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]A morphological evolution of crystals growth has been investigated using two dimensional (2D) multi-phasefield (MPF) simulations. Cementite carbide growth is taken as an example in the present case, while concern is given in simulating the preferred growth orientation of the carbide. In order to evaluate competitive growth between carbide seeds, variations on carbide seed orientation have been implemented. In the present model, variations of the seed orientations are embedded on the interfacial energy, thereby the anisotropy characteristic of interfacial energy can be obtained. Simulation utilized homogenous grain orientation that less than the preferred growth orientation results insignificant grain growths (first case). In the opposite way, simulation utilized homogenous grains orientation that equal or more then the preferred growth orientation, results in the homogenous significant grain growth (second case). On the other hand, simulation utilized heterogenous grains orientation involving grains in the first and second case, results a competition growth that inhibit and diminish the grains in the first case. It can be concluded that the present simulations works can show the existence of preferred orientation growth during grain growth phenomena including the growth of cementite carbide phase. © (2014) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland.[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Author keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]Cementite carbides,Competitive growth,Grain orientation,Growth orientations,Growth phenomena,Morphological evolution,Phase-field simulation,Preferred orientations[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Indexed keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]Cementite carbide,Growth orientation,Phase-field simulation[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Funding details” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”DOI” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.606.79[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]Widget Plumx[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][/vc_column][/vc_row]