Enter your keyword

2-s2.0-84947129881

[vc_empty_space][vc_empty_space]

Computational fluid dynamics study on cross flow pressure drop for triangular array rod assemblies with wire

Pramuditya S.a, Takahashi M.b, Ninokata H.c

a Nuclear Physics and Biophysics Research Division, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, 40132, Indonesia
b Research Laboratory for Nuclear Reactors, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku, 152-8550, Japan
c Dipartimento di Energia, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, 20156, Italy

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624529070653{padding-top: 30px !important;padding-bottom: 30px !important;}”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner layout=”boxed”][vc_column_inner width=”3/4″ css=”.vc_custom_1624695412187{border-right-width: 1px !important;border-right-color: #dddddd !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-radius: 1px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Abstract” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]© 2014 Elsevier Ltd.A numerical study on modeling of cross flow pressure drop coefficient for wire-wrapped triangular rod array has been performed. The objective is to clarify and also to extend the current modeling of cross flow pressure drop coefficient employed in subchannel analysis method. This study includes both pure laminar and fully turbulent flow conditions. Firstly, simulations employing pin pitch to diameter ratio (P/D) of 1.21 are carried out, and the results are compared with available experimental data in terms of wire correction parameter. The results for P/D = 1.21 are in good agreement with experimental data. Calculations employing smaller values of P/D, representing tight lattice rod configuration, have also been carried out. Based on the numerical results, new correlations of cross flow pressure drop are proposed. The correlations can be used to evaluate cross flow pressure drop coefficient in subchannel analysis codes.[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Author keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]Cross flows,Current modeling,New correlations,Numerical results,Pitch-to-diameter ratios,Rod configurations,Subchannel analysis,Triangular arrays[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Indexed keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]CFD,Crossflow,Pressure drop,Subchannel analysis,Wire-wrapped rod[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Funding details” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”DOI” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.06.053[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]Widget Plumx[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][/vc_column][/vc_row]