[vc_empty_space][vc_empty_space]
Magnetic simulation comparation of 30 kW switched reluctance motor with 6/4 and 6/10 design configurations for electric vehicle
Sholahuddin U.a, Purwadi A.a, Heryana N.a, Rizqiawan A.a, Haroen Y.a
a School of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Institute of Technology Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624529070653{padding-top: 30px !important;padding-bottom: 30px !important;}”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner layout=”boxed”][vc_column_inner width=”3/4″ css=”.vc_custom_1624695412187{border-right-width: 1px !important;border-right-color: #dddddd !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-radius: 1px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Abstract” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]© 2014 IEEE.Comparation of switched-reluctance motor (SRM) with 6/4 and 6/10 design configurations are presented in this paper. Both configurations are calculated and designed in detail to obtain the flux and torque characteristics. The study also conduct analysis for both configurations. Simulation of SRM using 2D finite element model is presented to support the analysis, and used to predict the torque produced at various currents and rotor positions. The time stepped FEA, is the most accurate method available to obtain the magnetic characteristic in an electromagnetic device. In this paper torque and flux characteristic of the model 6/4 SRM and 6/10 SRM are evaluated and compared. The SRM 6/4 produced maximum torque at 102 Nm and for SRM 6/10 produced at 145.2 Nm, so SRM 6/10 produce 42.3% greater torque than 6/4 configuration, both configuration are suitable for electric vehicle application.[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Author keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]Design configurations,Electromagnetic devices,Flux characteristics,Magnetic characteristic,Simulation,SRM,Switched Reluctance Motor,Torque characteristic[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Indexed keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]Finite Element Analysis,Modelling,Simulation,SRM[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Funding details” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”DOI” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEECS.2014.7045234[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]Widget Plumx[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][/vc_column][/vc_row]