[vc_empty_space][vc_empty_space]
Comparison of preamble and Cyclic Prefix method for Frequency Synchronization in OFDM systems
Iskandara, Khabzli W.b
a School of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung, 40132, Indonesia
b Politeknik PCR Riau, Indonesia
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624529070653{padding-top: 30px !important;padding-bottom: 30px !important;}”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner layout=”boxed”][vc_column_inner width=”3/4″ css=”.vc_custom_1624695412187{border-right-width: 1px !important;border-right-color: #dddddd !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-radius: 1px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Abstract” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]© 2016 IEEE.In this paper, we propose a comparison method of training symbol (or preamble) and Cyclic Prefix (CP) to improved the frequency synchronization in orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM). The problems that arise in OFDM system is the time-shift and frequency mismatch between the oscillators in the transmitter and the receiver. It is known as a Carrier Frequency Offset (CFO) problem. By exploring the signal to noise ratio (SNR) and CFO, the bit error rate (BER) performance can be improved significantly for both method. From simulation results, it is found that both method of CP and the preamble work optimally in the range of CFO values between-0.4 to 0.4. Otherwise, on CFO 0.5 both method would produce an unacceptable BER. Additionally, we found that preamble method perform better than CP for all the value of CFO.[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Author keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]Bit error rate (BER) performance,Carrier frequency offsets,Comparison methods,Cyclic Prefix,Frequency mismatch,Frequency synchronization,Preamble,Training symbols[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Indexed keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]BER,CFO,Cyclic Prefix,OFDM,Preamble[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Funding details” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”DOI” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]https://doi.org/10.1109/TSSA.2016.7871071[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]Widget Plumx[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][/vc_column][/vc_row]