[vc_empty_space][vc_empty_space]
Utilization of polypropylene to substitute Bitumen for asphalt concrete wearing course (Ac-Wc)
Sembiring E.a, Rahman H.a, Siswaya Y.M.a
a Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624529070653{padding-top: 30px !important;padding-bottom: 30px !important;}”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner layout=”boxed”][vc_column_inner width=”3/4″ css=”.vc_custom_1624695412187{border-right-width: 1px !important;border-right-color: #dddddd !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-radius: 1px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Abstract” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]© Int. J. of GEOMATE.In this study, Polypropylene (PP) plastics waste with various concentrations of 0.5%, 0.8%, and 1% were investigated to substitute bitumen’s mass. The mixing of plastics and asphalt was conducted by wet method, which added PP plastic into the asphalt when being heated so it produced a homogeneous mixture. Then, AC-WC mixture was made with bitumen contents of 5%, 5.5%, 6%, 6.5%, and 7%. Each mixture was carried out in triplicate for every plastic’s concentrations. Five parameters of mixtures were tested by Marshall Method, as follows: VIM, VMA, VFA, stability, and flow. Then, all the parameters were plotted in bar chart to determine an OBC (optimum bitumen content). Changes in rheological properties after the addition of PP plastics occurs which indicates the increasing of viscosity, softening point, flash point, and the decreasing of density, penetration and solubility. Based on Marshall Test, the OBC for asphalt pen 60/70 was 5.4% while the OBC with PP plastic content of 0.5%, 0.8% and 1%, consecutively, were 5.41%, 5.43% and 5.45%. Despite the increasing of OBC, this substitution of bitumen to plastics has some advantages such as increasing stability and remaining strength index (RSI), reducing plastic waste generation and asphalt cost. However, it has disadvantages such as it consumes more energy and it increases gas emission.[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Author keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Indexed keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]Asphalt,Bitumen,Plastic waste,Polypropylene,Recycling[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Funding details” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]This study was supported by the Research Centre for Infrastructure and Regional Development, ITB, which is funded by Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education under “Riset Unggulan Perguruan Tinggi” schema.[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”DOI” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]https://doi.org/10.21660/2018.42.17347[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]Widget Plumx[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][/vc_column][/vc_row]