Enter your keyword

2-s2.0-85055772510

[vc_empty_space][vc_empty_space]

Experimental analysis to design optimum phase type and salinity gradient of Alkaline Surfactant Polymer flooding at low saline reservoir

Riswati S.S.a, Bae W.a, Park C.b, Permadi A.K.c, Efriza I.d, Min B.a

a Department of Energy and Mineral Resources Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul, South Korea
b Department of Energy and Resources Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, South Korea
c Petroleum Engineering Department, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung, Indonesia
d E&D Department, PT. SPR Langgak, Jakarta, Indonesia

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624529070653{padding-top: 30px !important;padding-bottom: 30px !important;}”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner layout=”boxed”][vc_column_inner width=”3/4″ css=”.vc_custom_1624695412187{border-right-width: 1px !important;border-right-color: #dddddd !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-radius: 1px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Abstract” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]© 2018 Elsevier B.V.This paper presents the experimental analysis to find the optimum alkaline-surfactant-polymer (ASP) formula and the effects of salinity gradient suitable for oil reservoirs with low salinity formation water. It has been challenging to obtain high oil recovery when the reservoir salinity is lower than the injection salinity of ASP formulation. This paper carried out phase behavior tests for 28 experiments with 22 kinds of surfactant and subsequent coreflooding for the optimum formula with pre-designed salinity gradient profiling for pre-flush, ASP slug, and polymer drive. The optimum ASP formula from the phase behavior study, i.e., 0.5 wt% Linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS), 2 wt% Diethylene glycol butyl ether (DGBE), and 1 wt% Na2CO3, results in the optimum salinity of 2.8 wt% NaCl with 10 cc/cc solubilization ratio, and the middle phase type III microemulsion occurs in the range of 2.5–3.4 wt% NaCl. The oil recovery implementing this formula and negative salinity gradient, i.e. Winsor type II-III-I for coreflooding experiments are about 75.8% which is better than the other salinity gradients such as Winsor type I-II-I and I-III-I. Excluding high saline pre-flush, the salinity gradient consisted of Winsor type I-II-I and Winsor type I-III-I are able to recover the desirable amount of oil. The results could be applicable on designing the optimal ASP flooding at low salinity formation considering the formulation of surfactants and co-solvents, and the effects of salinity gradients.[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Author keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]Alkaline surfactant polymers,Alkaline-surfactant-polymer flooding,ASP flooding,Core flooding,Experimental analysis,Linear alkylbenzene sulfonates,Low salinity,Salinity gradients[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Indexed keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]ASP flooding,Core flooding,Low salinity,Phase behavior,Salinity gradient[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Funding details” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]This work was supported by the Energy Resources R&D Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korean Government Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Republic of Korea (No. 20172510102290 ).[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”DOI” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.09.087[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]Widget Plumx[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][/vc_column][/vc_row]