[vc_empty_space][vc_empty_space]
An investigation of spatial resolution and noise in reconstructed CT images using iterative reconstruction (IR) and filtered back-projection (FBP)
Anam C.a,b, Haryanto F.b, Widita R.b, Arif I.b, Dougherty G.c
a Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
b Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia
c Applied Physics and Medical Imaging, California State University Channel Islands, United States
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624529070653{padding-top: 30px !important;padding-bottom: 30px !important;}”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner layout=”boxed”][vc_column_inner width=”3/4″ css=”.vc_custom_1624695412187{border-right-width: 1px !important;border-right-color: #dddddd !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-radius: 1px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Abstract” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]© Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.This study compared the spatial resolution and the amount of noise in CT images reconstructed using the iterative reconstruction (IR) and filtered back-projection (FBP) techniques. We used a circular homogeneous phantom (pixel value of 0.5) containing a small circle at its center, with a diameter of 0.53-cm and a pixel value of 1.0. In order to reconstruct the image, we used the simultaneous iterative reconstruction technique (SIRT) with 5, 15, 25, 35 and 45 iterations respectively, and FBP with a Ram-Lak filter. The spatial resolution of the reconstructed image was characterized by the modulation transfer function (MTF) and image noise was characterized by the standard deviation within the homogeneous area. We found that the spatial resolution using SIRT with 35 iterations is similar to using FBP. The spatial resolution using SIRT tends to be worse using less than 35 iterations, and it tends to be better using more than 35 iterations. Using SIRT, image noise decreased with increasing iterations. The standard deviation for the SIRT technique using 45 iterations was about 0.02 similar to the FBP technique. Thus, SIRT could potentially produce better spatial resolution than the FBP technique with comparable image noise.[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Author keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]Filtered back projection,Image noise,Iterative reconstruction,Pixel values,Reconstructed image,Simultaneous iterative reconstruction techniques,Spatial resolution,Standard deviation[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Indexed keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Funding details” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]This work was funded by the Research and Innovation Program, Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) No. 006n/I1.C01/PL/2016.[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”DOI” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1127/1/012016[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]Widget Plumx[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][/vc_column][/vc_row]