Enter your keyword

2-s2.0-85067514941

[vc_empty_space][vc_empty_space]

Detailed comparison of instructor and student-based assessment in project based learning

Setiawan A.W.a

a School of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624529070653{padding-top: 30px !important;padding-bottom: 30px !important;}”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner layout=”boxed”][vc_column_inner width=”3/4″ css=”.vc_custom_1624695412187{border-right-width: 1px !important;border-right-color: #dddddd !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-radius: 1px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Abstract” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]© 2019 IEEE.Mixed-mode approach, that combines project-based learning and traditional learning, is introduced in biosignal measurement and instrumentation course. The course outline consists of lecture for 11 weeks and PBL for the last six weeks. In PBL assessment, only a few studies explore the detailed differences or similarities of the criteria in instructor and student-based (self and peer) assessment. In this research, Tukey’s HSD is used to determine the mean difference between two specific pair of assessment criterion. Differences of instructor-self, instructor-peer, and self-peer assessment pairs for introduction, project demonstration, and answer during Q&A session criteria are not statistically significant. For literature review, specifications, block diagram, design, conclusion, citations, and clarity of writing criteria; the differences of self-peer assessment pair is not statistically significant. It means that the students assess their own work and other groups in a similar manner. For these seven criteria, the difference of instructor-self and instructor-peer assessment pairs is statistically significant. In this study, Pearson’s correlation (r) is used to measure the strength of correlation between instructor-self, instructor-peer, and self-peer assessment. In project demonstration and answer during Q&A session criteria, all these pairs have strong correlation. In the introduction, block diagram, and citations criteria; only instructor-peer assessment pair that has strong correlation. In the design criterion, only self-peer assessment pair has strong correlation.[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Author keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]Instructor assessment,Mixed mode,Project based learning,Student-based,Tukey[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Indexed keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]Biomedical engineering education,Instructor assessment,Mixed-mode learning,Project-based learning,Student-based assessment,Tukey[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Funding details” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”DOI” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725126[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]Widget Plumx[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][/vc_column][/vc_row]