[vc_empty_space][vc_empty_space]
Characterization of Volcanic Ash from the 2017 Agung Eruption, Bali, Indonesia
Devi S.a, Bijaksana S.a, Fajar S.J.a, Santoso N.A.b
a Department of Geophysical Engineering, Faculty of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, 40132, Indonesia
b Department of Sciences, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Lampung, Indonesia
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624529070653{padding-top: 30px !important;padding-bottom: 30px !important;}”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner layout=”boxed”][vc_column_inner width=”3/4″ css=”.vc_custom_1624695412187{border-right-width: 1px !important;border-right-color: #dddddd !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-radius: 1px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Abstract” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]© 2019 IOP Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.In 2017, Mount Agung in Bali, Indonesia erupted after 54 years of dormancy. This eruption produced large amount of ash causing disruptions in this major tourist destination. Scientifically, however, this eruption produced important research material (volcanic ash). In this study, volcanic ash samples from 2017 Mount Agung eruption is subjected to geochemical and magnetic analyses, to gather information regarding the magmatic processes beneath Mount Agung. Samples were collected from four locations of varying distances. Magnetic analyses include measurement of magnetic susceptibility and hysteresis parameters, while geochemical analyses were carried out to determine the composition of major elements. These analyses are supplemented by petrographic analyses. Preliminary results show that the magnetic susceptibility values of the samples vary from 778 to 1002 × 10-8 m3/kg, the grain type is non-SP until the SP and non-SP grain mixtured, and the magnetic domain is the PSD and SP which differ significantly different from that of volcanic ash samples from other volcanos (Kelud, Sinabung, Soputan, Bromo, Merapi, Slamet) reported by previous studies. The results signify the potential use of rock magnetic methods combined with geochemical and petrographic analyses in characterizing volcanic ash.[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Author keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]Bali , Indonesia,Geochemical analysis,Magmatic process,Magnetic analysis,Magnetic methods,Major elements,Petrographic analysis,Tourist destinations[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Indexed keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Funding details” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”DOI” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/318/1/012014[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]Widget Plumx[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][/vc_column][/vc_row]