[vc_empty_space][vc_empty_space]
The design of noise attenuation for gas turbine GTS 22 engine
Pinandhita L.R.a, Hartono F.a, Prasetiyo I.a
a Aerospace Engineering Department, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624529070653{padding-top: 30px !important;padding-bottom: 30px !important;}”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner layout=”boxed”][vc_column_inner width=”3/4″ css=”.vc_custom_1624695412187{border-right-width: 1px !important;border-right-color: #dddddd !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-radius: 1px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Abstract” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]© 2019 Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.Nowadays, awareness of global society to the green concept where life should be in harmony with nature has been increasing. One of the ideas in the green concept is to reduce excessive sound exposures or noise. Within this context, gas turbine GTS 22 engine is one of mechanical system that generates a very high sound pressure level. Hence, it is instructive to develop noise controls for the gas turbine in order to have acceptable sound pressure level. This research is focused on the design of muffler as noise control treatment after carefully analyzing the dominant noise spectrum of the gas turbine. In this paper, numerical approach is employed to design the muffler. The results are then validated by experimental ones. Moreover, noise reduction (NR) is used to assess the muffler performances. The design of muffler in this research contains all of combination treatment: area cross section expansion chamber, perforated system (micro perforated panel), porous material, partition chamber and concentric tube. The chosen final design of muffler is combination treatment design where NR 38.77 dB is present. This NR leads to sound pressure level of 80.82 dB or 68.95 dBA exist after the muffler applied on the exhaust of gas turbine. The deviation of experimental results compared to numerical ones is 7.14% in average. Moreover, the pressure drop (ΔP) of the muffler is only 0.4042% which is acceptable to keep the mechanical performance.[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Author keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]Combination treatments,Control treatments,Mechanical performance,Mechanical systems,Micro-perforated panels,Noise attenuation,Numerical approaches,Sound pressure level[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Indexed keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Funding details” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”DOI” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/645/1/012013[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]Widget Plumx[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][/vc_column][/vc_row]