Enter your keyword

2-s2.0-85081158466

[vc_empty_space][vc_empty_space]

Computational analysis of resistance to alveolar bone resorption of osseointegrated implant

Miranda A., Rusyanti Y., Hendiani I., Dirgantara T., Metta P., Carolina D.N.

a Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran Faculty of Mechanical and Aerospace, Bandung Institute of Technology Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor, Indonesia

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624529070653{padding-top: 30px !important;padding-bottom: 30px !important;}”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner layout=”boxed”][vc_column_inner width=”3/4″ css=”.vc_custom_1624695412187{border-right-width: 1px !important;border-right-color: #dddddd !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-radius: 1px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Abstract” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd, Switzerland.Dental implant failure started with a resorption on alveolar crest. Resorption occurred if the stress is greater than the strength threshold (ultimate strength). Alveolar bone applied with mechanical loads will adapt their strength by remodelling; which is apposition or destruction depends on internal stress level distributed on the bones. This research was conducted using Finite Element Method (FEM). A CBCT image of osseointegrated implant model was converted into computerized 3D finite element digital model. The model was given material properties, fixed support, and being simulated on occlusal loads of 87 N and friction loads of 29 N for 0.7 seconds. Maximum principal loads on alveolar bone of implant model was 41 MPa and still below the ultimate strength (69 MPa). Based on the stress level above, it may be concluded that alveolar bone on osseointegrated implant model did not undergo resorption on simulation of mastication loads.[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Author keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]3-D finite elements,Alveolar bones,Alveolar crests,Computational analysis,Implant failures,Mechanical loads,Resorption,Ultimate strength[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Indexed keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]Alveolar Bone,Dental Implant,Finite Element Method,Resorption[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Funding details” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”DOI” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.829.241[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]Widget Plumx[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][/vc_column][/vc_row]