[vc_empty_space][vc_empty_space]
Comparison of structural performance of open frame structures based on SNI 03-1726-2002 and SNI 03-1726-2012
a Civil and Planning Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sriwijaya, Indralaya, Indonesia
b Center of Research and Development of People Residence, Ministry of Public Work and People Residence, Cileunyi, Bandung, Indonesia
c Structure Research Group, Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, 40132, Indonesia
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624529070653{padding-top: 30px !important;padding-bottom: 30px !important;}”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner layout=”boxed”][vc_column_inner width=”3/4″ css=”.vc_custom_1624695412187{border-right-width: 1px !important;border-right-color: #dddddd !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-radius: 1px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Abstract” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]© 2020 The Authors, published by EDP Sciences.The performance analysis of a building structure under inelastic conditions consisted of static and dynamic methods, which each divided into linear and non-linear categories. The performance-based analysis was included in the non-linear static category and described in the Applied Technology Council (ATC)-40, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 273, FEMA 356, and FEMA 440. In this study, some structural open frame models were assessed to determine the structural performance level. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the open frame building structural models using pushover analysis based on SNI-1726-2002, SNI-1726-2012, and ATC-40 codes. The structural element properties were modeled based on SNI-1726-2002 to represent the buildings previously constructed before the application of SNI-1726-2012. The results showed that the open frame structural models analysed based on SNI-1726-2012 code, had a lower performance points and structural performance levels compared to their counterpart models which were analysed based on SNI-1726-2002 code. Other models showed the opposite behavior due to differences in the characteristics of seismic zones, represented by the response spectrum curves in the SNI-1726-2002 and SNI-1726-2012 codes.[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Author keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]Building structure,Federal Emergency Management Agency,Performance analysis,Performance points,Performance-based analysis,Push-over analysis,Structural elements,Structural performance[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Indexed keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Funding details” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”DOI” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015605006[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]Widget Plumx[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][/vc_column][/vc_row]