[vc_empty_space][vc_empty_space]
Numerical Simulation for Bar Straightness Effect in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar
Afdhala, Gunawan L.a, Kariem M.A.a, Dirgantara T.a, Putra I.S.a
a Lightweight Structure Research Group, Faculty of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, 40132, Indonesia
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624529070653{padding-top: 30px !important;padding-bottom: 30px !important;}”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner layout=”boxed”][vc_column_inner width=”3/4″ css=”.vc_custom_1624695412187{border-right-width: 1px !important;border-right-color: #dddddd !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-radius: 1px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Abstract” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]© 2017 The Authors.Bars alignment in a Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar influences the quality of signal recorded during experiments, and thus affects the data of material properties being measured. There are some parameters directly related to the bars alignment such as their straightness, the impact face parallelism, and the neutral axis offset. This paper presents the study on the effects of non-straightness of an SHPB bar systems, dome shaped specimen, and striker bar to incident bar offset using numerical simulations. The bar component is made of AISI 4340 material with 10 mm diameter and 1000 mm length. The non-straightness of the bars and dome shaped specimen which occured due to the limitation of manufacturing process and availability of material, were measured by using dial gauges with ring supports in every 100 mm. First the simulation of an SHPB using ideal bar geometries were carried out. The simulations were then repeated by incorporating bar straightness, specimen surface, and striker bar to incident bar offset in the numerical model. From the comparisons of the material properties obtained from all simulations, it can be concluded that dome shaped specimen is the most affecting factor to the results of the SHPB measurement.[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Author keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]Affecting factors,Bar systems,Dial gauges,Manufacturing process,Neutral axis,Ring support,Specimen surfaces,Split Hopkinson pressure bars[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Indexed keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]dome shape specimen surface,non-straightness bar,numerical simulation[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Funding details” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”DOI” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.116[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]Widget Plumx[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][/vc_column][/vc_row]