[vc_empty_space][vc_empty_space]
Comparison of 1D magnetotelluric inversion using Levenberg-Marquardt and Occam’s inversion schemes
Martakusumah R.a, Srigutomo W.a
a Physics of Earth and Complex System, Fac. of Mathematic and Natural Sciences, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, 40132, Indonesia
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624529070653{padding-top: 30px !important;padding-bottom: 30px !important;}”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner layout=”boxed”][vc_column_inner width=”3/4″ css=”.vc_custom_1624695412187{border-right-width: 1px !important;border-right-color: #dddddd !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-radius: 1px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Abstract” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]© 2015 AIP Publishing LLC. One-dimensional (1D) inversion problem for magnetotelluric (MT) data are addressed using two different schemes: The Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) inversion and Occam-type inversion in order to obtain information on the resolvability of each scheme in recovering the Earth’s layered model. We tested both schemes to synthetic MT data generated from a blocky and a smooth model. Standard error (SE) is used as statistical criterion for comparing the fitness between the synthetic and the calculated data as well as the test model and the recovered model. It is revealed that based on the inherent properties posed by the LM and Occam inversion, the data SE is least for Occam method for both the blocky and the smooth models (log ρ a SE are 0.1167 and 0.0939 for LM and Occam, respectively; phase impedance SE are 0.0649 and 0.0432). The model fitness is achieved best by the Occam inversion (log ρ SE are 2.6504 and 1.2512).[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Author keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Indexed keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]Inversion,Levenberg-Marquardt,Magnetotelluric,Occam[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Funding details” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”DOI” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4917160[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]Widget Plumx[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][/vc_column][/vc_row]