[vc_empty_space][vc_empty_space]
Simulation of public policies on housing development for low income communities
Warsito S.a, Hatmoko J.U.D.a, Tamin R.Z.b
a Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
b Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624529070653{padding-top: 30px !important;padding-bottom: 30px !important;}”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner layout=”boxed”][vc_column_inner width=”3/4″ css=”.vc_custom_1624695412187{border-right-width: 1px !important;border-right-color: #dddddd !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-radius: 1px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Abstract” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]© 2019, Construction Research Institute of Malaysia. All rights reserved.Low developer’s interest to build affordable housing and low capacity of low-income residents in buying affordable house are some of the causes of the lack of proper subsidy policy for affordable housing development. The affordable house development policy needs to be formulated appropriately, in order to encourage developers’ interest in building affordable housing to meet low-income residents’ purchasing power needs. However, policy formulation is often constrained by the impact of the policy by both low-income residents and developers. In this research, the following stages are done; identification of variables affecting the purchasing power of low-income residents and developer’s interest, development of simulation model of the affordable housing problem, and policy simulation analysis of affordable housing problems. The methods used in this research are: Root Cause Analysis (RCA) applied to identify problems and related variables, Pairwise Comparison (Analytic Hierarchy Process method) to identify the weight of related variables, Dynamic System to develop a policy model, and Focus Group Discussion (FGD) were used to validate the affordable housing subsidy policy. The result of the research shows the absorption of government subsidy for the construction of affordable houses that are not right on target, the gap of affordable house price set by the government is not in accordance with the cost incurred by developers in building an affordable house, resulting in the lack of interest of developers, and the absence of banking access. The results of this study can provide various causes of the implementation problems of affordable housing.[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Author keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Indexed keywords” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text]Affordable house,Dynamic System,Low Income Residents,Simulation[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”Funding details” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_empty_space][megatron_heading title=”DOI” size=”size-sm” text_align=”text-left”][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]Widget Plumx[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1624528584150{padding-top: 25px !important;padding-bottom: 25px !important;}”][/vc_column][/vc_row]